From this demonstration here, it looks like VDC could handle most situations -
VDC is good enough. According to one manual I read when
X-Mode came out in the JDM market,
VDC is just one function of
X-Mode but it focuses on
getting as much static friction to the ground as possible, hence the use of all the control units, except the
BCU. More static friction, though, requires less wheel spin and it provided problems with some obstacles requiring more torque to the wheels. I assume that problem made Subaru program an extra mode for more wheel spin (
Dual X-Mode). Still, those with just one mode, many are still able to get the wheels to spin more just by turning
X-Mode off and relying only on the default
VDC.
Those are from what I have read only and I had to use a translator for the brochure. My VDC experience is with my baby sister's BL5 turbo and it's VDC is for a completely different application.
Can an older model with VDC be retrofitted (re-programmed?) with X-Mode?
It can be challenging as
X-Mode is a function of the communication between many different control units.
You still can have the VDC re-tuned using SSM3 at least. A good Subaru mechanic can adjust the delay for the traction control to engage. Older VDCs would engage the traction control to the free wheel after a few seconds but with
SSM3, it's possible to shorten the traction control engagement time.
'd prefer a manual, but x-mode seems like it would get you more places.
For me, driver input is more important. Manual and torque converter (TC) vehicles have different methods of clearing an obstacle but it really depends on the driver how he/she is going to maximise the gear he/she has.
The X-Mode, though, enables the driver to go really, really, really slow vs the regular auto.
I posted this before on another thread:
Throttle input is also limited so that the transmission gets just the right amount of torque needed and so that the TC doesn't spin too much causing unnecessary heat buildup, according to the brochure.